Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pragya's avatar

This was a wonderful read! I never though about 'good name' being a direct translation of 'shubh naam'.

The insecurity about getting our English right, in the way it should be as the English people speak it - whether in pronunciations or the usage of certain words- is a remnant of colonial shame. Like you said it, that flinch is the last colony. One we have to give up ourselves.

But it is a thing if we make it a thing. I have now been living in the US for a few years, and I have come to realize that nobody cares about your accent. Sometimes people might ask me to repeat a line if they didn't get it, just like I ask them to (because I have been so used to subtitles). We almost always have a good laugh about it. Besides there are people with thick accents who come from other parts of the world - east asian, east european. I haven't come across anyone who is as apologetic about their accent as we can be.

To your experience with the colleague- what if their concern was genuinely about the videos? Maybe the accent was only a part of the issue, if at all? Sometimes our insecurities make us less curious, because we assume that it is the whole of the problem :) . I could be totally wrong, but just food for thought.

Gary's avatar

The linguist John McWhorter says something to the effect of "dialects are all there is", and I think that's a useful way to frame what you're talking about. There is no such thing as "the English language", just a collection of more-or-less related dialects of English. The one spoken where I grew up in Scotland is one, the ones used in various parts of India are others.

The difference between them is political - "a language is a dialect with an army and navy".

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?